Public channels should collect routing information, not sensitive records, credentials, protected files, or unreviewed operational detail.
ARE Global helps organizations define the intake boundary, redaction standard, human-review checkpoints, output-use limits, escalation path, and documentation record for AI-assisted workflows.
The intake path should determine what may remain public, what requires controlled handling, and what must not be submitted through public channels.
Permitted
Organization name, responsible contact, general workflow type, intended use, review audience, urgency, desired output, and a short non-sensitive summary.
Scope required
Redacted records, source materials, internal policies, workflow evidence, and supporting files may be considered only after written scope, authorization, and handling rules are established.
Do not submit
SSNs, passwords, bank credentials, full card numbers, protected records, live credentials, security tokens, private keys, sealed files, and other restricted materials must not enter public channels.
Do not send SSNs, passwords, bank credentials, full card numbers, protected records, live credentials, security tokens, or restricted files through public channels.
No Social Security numbers, dates of birth, tax identifiers, full account numbers, identity documents, or unnecessary personal identifiers.
No passwords, recovery codes, one-time codes, bank credentials, API tokens, private keys, session data, or security tokens.
No protected health records, sealed materials, confidential third-party files, regulated data, restricted records, or information subject to special handling.
No live vulnerabilities, unauthorized access paths, exploit instructions, bypass methods, or operational details that could enable misuse.
The operating sequence establishes fit, authority, handling rules, review responsibility, and output limits before records move into the workflow.
Identify the organization, responsible owner, workflow, intended AI use, review audience, urgency, desired output, and a short non-sensitive summary.
Routing record without attachments or restricted information.
Define the business purpose, lawful authority, information classes, participating systems, affected parties, existing controls, exclusions, and responsible reviewers.
Written scope, authority statement, handling boundary, and named review owners.
Establish redaction, source support, prompt rules, human-review checkpoints, escalation triggers, retention expectations, and permitted output uses.
Documented workflow showing intake, redaction, AI support, human review, approval, retention, and production.
Separate known facts, source-supported analysis, assumptions, AI-assisted draft content, human-reviewed findings, unresolved limitations, and final approval.
Review-ready record that shows what the AI supported, what a human decided, and what remains unresolved.
AI-assisted output remains draft decision support until source support, assumptions, scope, sensitivity, and downstream use are reviewed by the responsible human authority.
Non-sensitive routing, issue classification, general summary structure, intake completeness checks, and review-audience identification.
Attachments, credentials, protected records, regulated data, live security detail, or restricted files.
Draft chronology, issue list, missing-record checklist, non-sensitive index, and source-traceability prompts.
Final legal conclusions, unsupported allegations, unverified findings, or representation that a draft is an official record.
Risk categories, control questions, options, decision-memo structure, escalation checklist, and unresolved-issue tracking.
Guaranteed risk ratings, fraud determinations, compliance certification, enforcement decisions, or automated final conclusions.
Options, risks to consider, source checks, questions for human review, and workflow prompts.
Automated approvals, denials, account actions, payment releases, personnel decisions, legal positions, or other consequential actions without separate authority and review.
Deliverables are tailored to the use case, review audience, information class, operating environment, and required decision quality.
Permitted fields, prohibited information, no-attachment rules, escalation triggers, public warnings, and routing expectations.
Plain-language inventory of identifiers, credentials, protected records, restricted files, and operational details that must stay outside public or unapproved AI channels.
Documented path covering intake, classification, redaction, prompting, source support, human review, approval, retention, and production.
Named reviewer roles, required source checks, assumption review, sensitivity review, rejection criteria, escalation points, and approval responsibilities.
Internal instructions for safer prompting, source limits, assumption labeling, draft status, output-use restrictions, and recordkeeping.
Known facts, source-supported analysis, AI-assisted draft notes, human-reviewed findings, open questions, limitations, risk flags, and approved next steps.
Reference only
May be used as a reference environment for governance, mapping, measurement, management, oversight, and documentation discussions. Reference does not imply certification, approval, compliance, or endorsement.
AI-assisted content must be reviewed for source support, accuracy, scope, assumptions, sensitive information, authorization, legal and policy boundaries, business impact, and downstream use before reliance.
Can sensitive records be submitted through this page?
No. This page is informational and public. No attachments until scope. Do not send SSNs, passwords, bank credentials, full card numbers, protected records, live credentials, security tokens, or restricted files through public channels.
Does ARE Global provide automated decisioning or formal model validation?
No. ARE Global provides advisory, documentation, workflow review, and decision-quality support. It does not provide automated approval or denial decisions, formal model validation, certification, security testing, or guaranteed outcomes.
How does the NIST AI Risk Management Framework relate to this work?
It may be used as a reference environment for governance, mapping, measurement, and management discussions. Reference to the framework does not imply certification, approval, compliance, or endorsement.
What should the first inquiry include?
Provide the organization name, responsible contact, workflow type, intended use of AI, review audience, urgency, desired output, and a short non-sensitive summary. Do not attach records before written scope and handling rules are established.
Provide the organization, responsible owner, workflow type, intended use of AI, review audience, urgency, desired output, and a short non-sensitive summary. Do not attach files before written scope and handling rules are established.
Institutional Risk Advisory | D-U-N-S: 145054428
Unique Entity ID: JHYYJCLHLWB6 | CAGE Code: 22QZ0 | SAM.gov registration active
D-U-N-S number provided for vendor, financial, and institutional verification purposes only.
Email: alfonso.evans@areglobalconsulting.net
Office: 218-693-2958
ARE Global Consulting LLC provides advisory, documentation, workflow review, and decision-quality support only. It does not provide legal advice, automated decisioning, formal model validation, certification, security testing, or guaranteed outcomes. Copyright 2026 ARE Global Consulting LLC. All rights reserved.