Skip to main content

Independent risk advisory · Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Risk decisions that hold up under review.

ARE Global Consulting LLC advises federal buyers, prime contractors, and regulated organizations on fraud risk and payment controls, identity verification, federal vendor readiness, and the decision quality of SI-assisted workflows. Every assignment has a written scope, a traceable evidence record, and one accountable principal.

At a glance

Entity
ARE Global Consulting LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company

SAM.gov
Registration active (activated July 29, 2026). Verify current status

UEI / CAGE
JHYYJCLHLWB6 / 22QZ0

Principal
Alfonso Ramon Evans, Founder & Principal Consultant

Identifiers support entity verification. They do not indicate a contract award, contract vehicle, or government endorsement.

Four advisory lanes. Defined outputs.

Each lane starts with one bounded question and ends with a work product a reviewer can check against the source record.

01 / Advisory lane

Fraud Risk & Payment Controls

Payment authorization, vendor and payment-instruction changes, exceptions, escalation, control ownership, and evidence that controls actually operated.

Typical outputs
Control-and-evidence matrix, decision memorandum, prioritized closure register.

02 / Advisory lane

Identity Verification & Documentation

Proofing and authentication steps in onboarding and access decisions, authority, exception paths, record retention, and decision traceability.

Typical outputs
Identity decision record, documentation-gap register, proposed closure criteria.

03 / Advisory lane

Federal Vendor Readiness

Business identity, capability claims, and supporting records organized against a stated buyer requirement, with open items assigned to an owner.

Typical outputs
Claim-and-evidence matrix, work-package brief, readiness register.

04 / Advisory lane

SI Workflow Decision Quality

Source quality, failure paths, human-review gates, escalation, and release responsibility in machine-assisted workflows. Human review is always required.

Typical outputs
Claim-to-source review, human-review gate design, remediation register.

How an assignment runs: TRACE

The method keeps the decision, its source support, its limits, and the accountable owner connected from scope to closure.

  1. Scope. Agree the question, the authorized record set, exclusions, audience, deliverable, and acceptance criteria before review begins.
  2. Trace and reconstruct. Record source provenance and rebuild the decision history, including approvals, exceptions, and missing records.
  3. Adversarially test and calibrate. Challenge assumptions and competing explanations. Separate source-supported fact from inference, conflict, and open questions.
  4. Evidence-ready action. State the recommendation, the responsible function, the validation evidence, and the closure condition.

What buyers can expect

One accountable principal

The founder scopes, reviews, releases, and corrects every deliverable. Reviewers know who stands behind each conclusion.

Evidence before conclusions

Findings distinguish source-supported fact, inference, conflicting evidence, and unknowns. A gap is reported as a gap, not as a finding of fault.

Bounded, written scope

One question, one record set, one deliverable, and written acceptance criteria. Changes go through a named approval path.

SI with human review

SI tools assist permitted analytical tasks inside an approved tool boundary. The principal checks every material conclusion against source evidence before release.

Inspect the work before you engage

Bring the requirement and the deadline.

Start with your organization, the decision to be made, the intended audience, and the timing. Do not send sensitive records, account numbers, identity documents, or credentials in a first message.

Office 218-693-2958  |  Mobile 412-518-6639

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania